Team Recaps 🔥 HOT

Pittsburg 58, Gilmer 56: Five Turnovers, Two Onside Kicks Taken Away, and a Yamboree Conversation This Town Keeps Having

A two-point home loss on Yamboree Friday ends the five-game streak and drops the Buckeyes to 5-2 and 1-1 in District 8-4A Division II. The town has five arguments going at once: the refs, the onside kicks, the Queen's Ball, the defense and the coaching. We take every one of them seriously, and we are not pretending any of them is why the scoreboard said what it said.

Pittsburg 58, Gilmer 56: Five Turnovers, Two Onside Kicks Taken Away, and a Yamboree Conversation This Town Keeps Having Team Recaps

The gist

  • Final: Pittsburg 58, Gilmer 56 at Jeff Traylor Stadium on Yamboree Friday. The five-game win streak is over. Gilmer is 5-2 overall, 1-1 in District 8-4A Division II. It is Pittsburg's first win in this series since 2018, and the 114 combined points are the most in 83 meetings going back to 1914.
  • Tayveon Horne: 21 carries, 178 yards, two touchdowns. 8.5 a carry on a night the passing game produced 18 yards. The offense scored 56 points. It did its job.
  • Five turnovers, two onside-kick recoveries waved off, a spot-foul pass interference in the end zone and a defense that gave up 58. Any one of those is a conversation. This town had all of them going by the time the lights went off, and this post is going to have every one of them too.
  • 284 points allowed in seven games, 40.6 a night. We have printed that sentence four weeks running. On Friday it stopped being a warning and became a final score.

What happened: we led 21-6 and then gave a 3-3 team 52 points

Let's start with the part nobody on either message board disputes. By the account of fans following it live, Gilmer led 14-0 before the end of the first quarter and 21-6 early in the second. Then the onside kicks started, the turnovers started, and Pittsburg scored 22 straight to take a 28-21 lead into the half. The second half was a trade: 35-28 Pittsburg, 35-35, 42-35, 42-42, a fumble, 49-42, 55-42, a Gilmer kickoff return touchdown to make it 55-49 with about six minutes left, a fourth-down stop by the Gilmer defense with about two minutes to go, and a touchdown with 1:15 left that put the Buckeyes in front 56-55. Pittsburg then drove to the Gilmer 15 and kicked the field goal that won it. A fan on the Gilmer Facebook group said it plainly: we were celebrating on the sideline when that last ten yards put them in range.

That is the game. 56 points, and we lost by two, and the two-point margin is the least interesting thing about it.

Our Wednesday preview called this a trap game three different ways: Yamboree Week, a letdown after Pleasant Grove, and a Pittsburg offense that had just scored 35 on top-ranked Carthage. We picked Gilmer anyway and said the ball-control offense would wear down Pittsburg's two-way starters. Grade: wrong, and wrong in the specific way we were worried about. Pittsburg's top four skill players start in their own secondary and were supposed to be gassed by the fourth quarter. By the account of fans following it live, they scored 16 points in the fourth quarter. The receipt we said Pleasant Grove's win had earned us got collected by the other sideline.

The guys who did it

Tayveon Horne was the offense. 21 carries, 178 yards, two touchdowns, two catches for 12 more. He is now at 139 carries for 915 yards and 15 rushing touchdowns on the season per the Joe Dodd notes plus Friday's box score, and he has not been held under 100 yards in a game this year. When this post gets to the parts about who did not make a play, understand that none of it is aimed at the running back.

Zade Taylor had the hardest night of his season through the air: 3-of-8 for 18 yards and two interceptions, after coming in 51-of-78 with seven touchdowns and five picks across six games. He also came in with a team-high 779 rushing yards and 12 rushing scores, and the message board's own verdict on him after Pleasant Grove was that he is the most frustrating player in the district to play against. One bad passing line does not change what he is. It does raise a game-plan question we get to below.

The offensive line opened 8.5 yards a carry against a front that lives in the backfield when it is right, and did it with the center situation still being sorted out after the Pleasant Grove injury. The kickoff return unit produced the touchdown that made the fourth quarter a game. The defense got the fourth-down stop with two minutes left that gave the offense the ball for the go-ahead drive. That stop was real, and it should have been the stop that won the game.

The box score we have lists no Gilmer defensive stats and no Pittsburg individuals. We are not going to credit a tackle we cannot see, and we are not going to name a kid for a missed one.

Fifty-eight

Pittsburg came in averaging 36.8 a game. Their season high was 55 against Liberty-Eylau in August. On Friday they set a new one against us, at our place, in a district game, with their quarterback a week back from injury. The Gilmer Mirror's game story put it as kindly as it could: the Buckeyes' defense "could not get the stop it needed in the closing minutes." The honest version is that it could not get the stop it needed in any of the four quarters, and the one stop it did get was undone 75 seconds later.

The thesis this stream has carried since Sulphur Springs now has a loss attached to it. Through seven games Gilmer has allowed 284 points. That is 40.6 a night. Since 2000, Gilmer is 254-17 when it scores 30 or more points; Friday was the seventeenth. Since 1980 this program has lost 20 games while scoring 30, and we just watched the twentieth. You do not get to December giving up 40, and we have now proven you do not get to the fourth Friday of October either.

40.6 points allowed per game. Pittsburg, Van and Pleasant Grove are the three teams that have beaten Gilmer on a Yamboree Friday since 2018. Three of the four scored 37 or more on us. The common thread in our Yamboree losses is not the carnival. It is a defense that could not hold.

The specific complaint from people who were in the stands, on both venues, is structural: a three-man front against six- and eight-man blocking surfaces, two of three starting defensive linemen out or limited after Pleasant Grove, linebackers who were a step slow to the edge once Pittsburg stopped running inside, and receivers running uncovered in the first half. Those are scheme and personnel decisions, which is what this stream is allowed to criticize. Nobody who reads this should go find a sixteen-year-old and tell him he was slow.

The onside kicks, and the kicks that were not

Here is the argument that has the town most united, and it is not the referees. Gilmer tried multiple onside kicks on Friday, at least three by the count of fans following it live, and the ones that did not come back to us handed a team we could not stop a short field. The halftime read on the message board was stop the onside kicks. The postgame read on the Facebook group was that somebody in this town has to be able to kick a ball thirty or forty yards, and you cannot keep giving a good team great field position while also losing the turnover battle five to nothing.

We are going to be fair to the decision before we criticize it. If you believe your defense cannot get a stop, then the math on an onside kick changes: you are trading a short field you were going to lose anyway for a chance at the ball. The 21-6 lead was built with that aggression. We get it. But the second half of that math is that if you steal the ball and still cannot stop them, you have given up possessions for nothing, and that is what the fourth quarter looked like. The kicks that were not onside did not go deep either. The question on every porch in Gilmer this morning is the same one, and it is not "does this town have a kicker." We have two, by the account of fans in the stands, and neither put a kickoff past the 30 all night. The question is what the kicking game is getting in practice. A leg does not get longer on Friday; it gets longer on Tuesday and Wednesday with somebody standing behind the kid who has the job and working on it. If the plan is to kick onside because the deep ball is not there, then the deep ball not being there is the thing to fix, with the kicker we have, not a search for a new one.

That is a coaching question, and it is a fair one. It is also fixable by Thursday.

The officiating, and what it was not

Now the part everybody wants, and the part we are going to be careful with, because there are two different claims here and only one of them is true.

The claim that is true: the officiating on Friday night was bad. Not "the home crowd was unhappy" bad; bad in ways that changed possessions. Two onside-kick recoveries were taken away. On the first, opening the second half, a Gilmer player caught the ball on the fly past midfield, which means it had gone its ten yards and then some. The Gilmer broadcast said it was good by three yards. A fan on the message board who is not in the business of defending Gilmer said half a yard, but good. It was given to Pittsburg. That was not a 50-50 call; that was a possession at midfield with a chance to go up a score to open the half, erased. Gilmer then scored anyway, kicked onside again, recovered it again, and was flagged for offsides. That one was close and may have been right; we are not going to pretend it was obviously wrong just because the first one was. Later, a pass interference in the end zone was called on the Gilmer defender, a spot foul, and Pittsburg scored the go-ahead touchdown from it. From the stands, the receiver was holding our defender, not the other way around. Add a run of holding calls that went one direction for most of three quarters, and you have a night where the officiating crew was a factor in the game. Fans on both venues said so. A Pittsburg poster on the message board made fun of Gilmer fans for saying so, and a note from here to him: you scored 58. You are allowed to be gracious.

The claim that is not true: that the officiating is why we lost. It is not. We will say it as plainly as we know how. A few of the late calls were every bit as bad and went our way, and we took them. You cannot turn it over five times, give up 58 points at home, and then put the result on the crew. Both things are true at the same time: the officiating was poor, and we lost the game ourselves. Holding the crew accountable for the first thing does not require pretending about the second.

One more thing, because it comes up every single week on social media. Somebody is going to post "if you think you can do better, go officiate" and somebody else is going to post "if you think you can do better, go coach." Both of those are the same lazy argument, and here is why it does not hold. Accountability has never required ability. A fan does not need to be able to run a 4.5 to say the corner got beat. A booster does not have to be able to get into a three-point stance, and most of the coaches in this district could not either, to say the front did not hold. If you could only criticize what you could personally do, nobody could say anything about anything, and the Gilmer Mirror would be a very short paper. The chairs at the Exxon food trucks would be empty. The whole point of writing this is that this town pays attention, and paying attention is the job. Keep doing it.

And since we are here: the Gilmer Mirror reports next week's game at Center has been moved from Friday to Thursday night because of a shortage of officials. There are not enough people doing this job in East Texas, and the ones doing it on Friday did it badly. Both of those are true too.

Yamboree, the Queen's Ball, and a conversation this town is allowed to have

Every year the East Texas Yamboree lands on the third weekend of October, Wednesday through Saturday. Gilmer schools close for it. The carnival runs until midnight on the courthouse square. The Queen's Coronation is Wednesday night at the Civic Center and runs again Thursday night, which is the night the town calls the Queen's Ball, and the Thursday crowd is the one the pageant is built for: the queen, the princess, the ladies-in-waiting, and the high-school-age crowd that comes with them. The Barn Dance is Saturday night and has been for as long as anybody we found can document; the Longview News-Journal covered its move in 2019 from the old Trinity Street gym to the new Event Center, and it was a Saturday then too. The street dances run Thursday, Friday and Saturday at 8:30. And the Buckeyes play a district football game on Friday night, in the middle of it.

The narrative in the stands every year is the same, and it was loud on Friday: the players were out late Thursday for the Queen's Ball, then up early at the field house, then asked to play a district game with their legs. Joe Dodd's notes confirm Coach Metzel kept early-morning practices on their normal schedule all week so the kids could take part in Yamboree. A fan on the message board noted the players are generally barred from Yamboree activities until Saturday. Both of those can be true and the narrative can still be true; this is a town of 5,000 and a week of family obligations, and a kid does not have to be on the Zipper at midnight to be tired on Friday.

So let's actually look at it instead of just saying it. Gilmer's Yamboree-Friday results, by the schedule, since 2018 (there was no Yamboree in 2020):

  • 2018: Pleasant Grove 14, Gilmer 0 (home)
  • 2019: Pleasant Grove 37, Gilmer 24 (away)
  • 2021: Gilmer 51, Liberty-Eylau 7 (away)
  • 2022: Gilmer 42, North Lamar 6 (away)
  • 2023: Gilmer 49, North Lamar 12 (home)
  • 2024: Gilmer 31, Van 23 (home)
  • 2025: Van 48, Gilmer 38 (away)
  • 2026: Pittsburg 58, Gilmer 56 (home)

That is 4-4 on Yamboree Friday over eight years, 2-2 at Jeff Traylor Stadium. Here is the part that should make everybody think: the four wins came against teams Gilmer outscored 173-48 combined. The four losses came against teams that could play: Pleasant Grove twice, a Van team that put up 48, and Pittsburg. When the Yamboree game is against a team that can play, this program is 0-4 since 2018. You can read that two ways. One is that Yamboree does not matter and a good team beats a lesser one on any Friday. The other is that Yamboree costs exactly the margin that decides a game against a good team, and the easy wins just hid it. We think it is the second one, and we also think it is not an excuse, because every other town in District 8-4A Division II knows what week it is and circled it.

Which brings up the question that has been floating around the square for years and that we think is worth asking out loud: does the Queen's Ball have to be Thursday? The coronation already runs Wednesday night. The Barn Dance is a Saturday ticketed show for grown folks with a headliner; it does not need a school night. The street dances are three nights running. If the football team is going to be the Friday-night centerpiece of Yamboree week, and it is, the town could put the one high-school-age night of the festival on Wednesday or Saturday and let the Thursday before a district game be a Thursday. We are not the Yamboree Association and we are not going to pretend rescheduling a festival that has run since 1935 is simple. But Gilmer is also a town that has won four state championships and played in nine state title games, and it is allowed to notice that its biggest week and its football team's hardest week are the same week, and ask whether that has to be true.

Around the barbecue

The pregame conversation on the message board had the right fears pointed at the right things: a trap game, a center position still being sorted, Yamboree, and a Pittsburg skill group that doubles as its secondary. Everybody picked Gilmer by two or three touchdowns. One poster asked, before kickoff, whether Yamboree had this one dead. He was joking. By halftime nobody on the thread was.

Postgame, the two venues split in a way that tells you something. On the message board, the argument is coaching: the game plan, the three-man front, the rotations in the secondary, the decision to keep kicking onside, and the broad verdict that Gilmer was out-coached by a staff that used to work here. One poster's list of what went wrong ran fourteen items long and included "two onside recoveries overturned, for reasons." On the Facebook group, the argument is discipline and effort: five turnovers, scoring too fast with 1:15 left, celebrating before the clock said zero, kickers who cannot kick deep. The Facebook group also had the one post everybody in town should read, from a parent who noted there were a quarter as many people on the field after this loss as after the Pleasant Grove win, and that these are kids, and the ones who need you most are the ones who just lost.

There is a third camp too, and it is not small: the people who think all of this is noise. Their read is that Gilmer has a standard, the other team wanted it more, and the finger-pointing is the part that actually hurts the kids.

The disagreement in the room is not whether something went wrong. It is whose something it was: the kids who turned it over, the staff that put them in a three-man front and kept kicking it short, or the crew in stripes. We think the honest answer is the first two in that order, with the third one earning every bit of the noise it got and none of the credit for the result.

Our take

First, the part that is real: this offense scored 56 points with 18 passing yards. Horne is having an all-district season. The kickoff return and the fourth-down stop are the two plays that gave this team a lead with 75 seconds left against a team that scored on nearly every possession. 5-2 with Center, Carthage and Spring Hill left is still a program playing like a program. Nothing in this post flattens that.

Now the takes, and they are ours.

One: the best players on a football team are supposed to make the play when the game is on the line, and on Friday the defense did not have one who did. We are not going to put a name on that. These are high schoolers and the line this stream does not cross is a kid's character. But it is fair to say, about a unit, that Gilmer's defense has talent that gets talked about across the state and it has not produced a game-deciding play in seven games. Pittsburg lined up for a field goal from the 15 with the season on the line and nobody got a hand on it. The offense has been making the play when it was needed every week since Chapel Hill. The defense needs its own version of Horne: somebody who shows up in the box score when the box score is about to be decided. Until it has one, forty a night is what it is going to look like.

Two: the onside kicks were a symptom, not a disease. You do not kick onside three times against a 3-3 team because you are aggressive. You do it because you do not believe your defense can get the ball back, and the staff was right not to believe it. The fix is not to stop kicking onside. The fix is a defense that lets you kick it deep. That said, if the depth kick is not available because the leg is not there, that is a Monday problem with a Monday solution, and we expect to see it solved at Center.

Three: the passing game is a plan question before it is a talent question. 779 rushing yards from a quarterback and 915 from a running back is the best answer in the district to almost anything. It is also an answer a secondary can sit on, and Pittsburg's two-way guys sat on it. The receiver room that beat Pleasant Grove got eight attempts. Second-and-short pass calls that became interceptions did not help, and a spread offense that throws eight times is a spread offense that has decided not to spread. The staff does not need a new quarterback. It needs to let this one throw it to the kids who caught 325 and 305 yards' worth before Friday.

The officiating was bad. The onside kicks were costly. The Queen's Ball was Thursday. And we still led with 1:15 left and gave up a field-goal drive. Everything else is a conversation; that last one is the game.

And the honesty on the opponent, because they earned it: Pittsburg is a real football team. They scored 35 on Carthage and 58 on us. Their head coach and defensive coordinator both coached here and knew what was coming and when. That is a program that went 13-50 over six years and is now 4-3 with a signature win. "They were 3-3" was never a sentence worth writing and it is a worse one today.

To that third camp: this is not negativity. It is accountability, and you can do both. We are backing these kids and we are also saying the tackling was bad, the kick coverage was bad, and the plan did not hold up, because they are high school football players at Gilmer, not toddlers, and they hear harder than that in the film room on Monday. What we are doing here is putting every argument the town is already having, on the square, on the message board, on Facebook and at the field house, in one place with the numbers next to it, so it gets had honestly instead of in the comments. None of it means the season is over. This is the same team that beat Pleasant Grove and held the best offense on the schedule to 27 a week ago, and dominated that game for three quarters. It can be done; we watched it get done.

Falsifiable marker for Thursday: if Gilmer allows more than 28 points at Center, we are going to write that the defense is now the season's story and stop calling it a concern. If Gilmer kicks deep and covers, we will say the Monday problem got fixed. A specific number, in writing, graded here.

Next up: at Center, Thursday

Per the Gilmer Mirror, the District 8-4A Division II game at Center has been moved from Friday, Oct. 23 to Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026, 6:30 p.m. at Roughrider Stadium because of the officials shortage. MaxPreps still lists Friday as of this writing; trust the school. That means a short week after a short night, no Yamboree, no home crowd, and a Center team that gets Gilmer coming off a loss. Then Carthage comes to Gilmer on Oct. 30. 1-1 in district with three to play and the playoff math still right there. It is just not a given anymore.

5-2 is still 5-2, and getting a read wrong on a Friday is cheaper than refusing to make one. We were wrong about Pittsburg. We were right about the defense. If you'd rather put your reads where your mouth is than shout them at a referee, that is literally the game.

Frequently asked questions

What was the final score of Gilmer vs. Pittsburg?
Pittsburg beat Gilmer 58-56 at Jeff Traylor Stadium in Gilmer on Friday, Oct. 16, 2026, during East Texas Yamboree week. It was a District 8-4A Division II game. Gilmer is now 5-2 overall and 1-1 in district; Pittsburg is 4-3 and 1-1.
Who led Gilmer in rushing against Pittsburg?
Junior running back Tayveon Horne (#6) carried 21 times for 178 yards and two touchdowns, 8.5 yards a carry, and caught two passes for 12 yards. He has 915 rushing yards and 15 rushing touchdowns on the season.
How did Zade Taylor throw it against Pittsburg?
Zade Taylor (#2) finished 3-of-8 for 18 yards with two interceptions. He entered the game 51-of-78 for 741 yards, seven touchdowns and five interceptions, with a team-high 779 rushing yards.
How many points has Gilmer allowed this season?
Through seven games Gilmer has allowed 284 points, 40.6 per game, while scoring 344, 49.1 per game. The 58 points Pittsburg scored were the most Gilmer has allowed this season and a Pittsburg season high.
Is the Gilmer vs. Center game on Friday?
No. The Gilmer Mirror reports the District 8-4A Division II game at Center has been moved from Friday, Oct. 23 to Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026, 6:30 p.m. at Roughrider Stadium in Center, because of a shortage of officials. Check with Gilmer ISD before you drive.
Put it to work

Think you can call the games?

Free NFL pick’em pools, survivor, confidence picks, and squares — play against friends or the whole site.

Make your Week picks
← All posts